Louisiana patient tests positive for bird flu – on par with Dr. Peter Hotez’s pandemic threats once Trump takes office

• H5N1 has now been detected in a hospitalized patient in Louisiana, marking the first severe case in the U.S.
• Dr. Peter Hotez mockingly warned of multiple viral threats coming to the U.S. once Donald Trump takes office, including H5N1 bird flu.
• PCR tests for H5N1 will likely be unleashed en masse on human patients, making all winter illnesses and hospitalizations appear to be a bird flu pandemic.
• The CDC continues research on the virus, highlighting the potential for increased human-to-human transmission, which is historically rare.

Dr. Peter Hotez warned that the H5N1 bird flu would be unleashed once Trump takes office

The medical establishment, seeking to reassert its authority over the population, appears to be preparing for a new wave of infectious disease hysteria. This time, the catalyst is the case of H5N1 bird flu in Louisiana, which comes on the heels of ominous projections by Dr. Peter Hotez, a vaccine pusher who warns of impending threats from various viral outbreaks coming once Trump takes office.

Dr. Hotez, who has been a vocal proponent of vaccination, recently made headlines by predicting a wave of deadly viral infections that could hit the United States right after the inauguration of the new Trump administration. Among the viruses that Hotez is particularly concerned about is H5N1 bird flu, which has now reportedly claimed its first severe case in the United States.

On December 18, the CDC announced that a person in Louisiana had been hospitalized with H5N1, marking the nation’s first serious case of the disease. The patient, who had been exposed to sick and dead birds in backyard flocks, likely caught the virus from these sources. While the CDC maintains that the risk of H5N1 infection among the general public remains low, its warning comes with a significant caveat — there is no evidence of the virus spreading between humans.

However, this cautious statement has not deterred the medical establishment from ramping up the rhetoric. Dr. Hotez’s alarmist predictions about multiple viral outbreaks, including H5N1 and other emerging coronaviruses, have created a sense of impending doom. His warnings come at a time when the public is still grappling with the confusion and fear engendered by the COVID-19 pandemic, which was marked by a lack of transparency and numerous incidents of fraudulent activity, including planned bio-terror propaganda and coercive vaccine messaging,

The question that arises is whether this renewed focus on infectious diseases is nothing more than a calculated effort to regain public trust and compliance with public health mandates, narratives, and officials. The mainstream media, with its proven history of promoting sensational headlines and bio-terror propaganda, is once again playing into the hands of the medical establishment.

Infectious disease narratives and bio-terror propaganda: a war for the mind

The methods being employed are eerily similar to those used during the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic, which utilized PCR tests en masse to give the illusion that people’s seasonal sicknesses were all from some new source – COVID-19. In this hysteria, common illnesses like influenza, colds, pneumonia, and various other respiratory infections radically disappeared overnight. The CDC and other health organizations may soon push for expanded PCR testing for bird flu in humans. PCR is widely criticized for its false positives and over-diagnosis. Additionally, there is talk of developing new vaccine programs aimed at combating these “emerging threats,” a familiar tactic from the recent past.

What is most concerning is the lack of critical discourse around these warnings. The scientific community continues to embrace gain-of-function virology research, which many experts have argued could potentially create more dangerous pathogens. This research, while defended by some as necessary for understanding and preventing outbreaks, has its own ethical and safety concerns and could be weaponized to control populations.

In the face of such a narrative, it is imperative for the public to remain skeptical and demand substantive proof of the threats being posited. The fear-mongering tactics used during the COVID-19 pandemic have shown that they can be both easily manipulated and exploited for political and economic gain.

As Dr. Hotez and his allies seek to create a sense of urgency around new viral threats, the public would be wise to look critically at the evidence and motivations behind such claims. The ongoing research on H5N1 and other infectious diseases should not be a pretext for a new round of restrictive public health measures and mandates. It is more important to learn about the underlying reasons why new disease labels are generated and what’s really at the core of sicknesses in the population, and what can be done to prevent and treat them, without devolving society into a cesspit of hysteria and fearful mind and behavioral controls.

Sources include:

LiveScience.com

IndiaTimes.com

CDC.gov