Trump administration reportedly preparing for military strikes on Iran, raising fears of escalation

03/28/2025 / By Finn Heartley

The U.S. is reportedly moving B-2 or B-21 stealth bombers to Diego Garcia, a strategic base near Iran, enabling rapid strikes without overflight permissions from neighboring countries.
Analysts warn that attacking Iran could trigger a wider conflict, as Russia and China have mutual defense ties with Tehran, potentially drawing them into direct confrontation.
Critics accuse the Trump administration of aligning with Israeli interests, with claims that strikes on Iran could provoke a nuclear response from Russia in defense of its ally.
Russia may retaliate with military force if Iran is attacked, while China could impose economic sanctions or support proxy warfare, further destabilizing global security.
A U.S. strike on Iran risks triggering economic collapse, fuel shortages, and even nuclear war, with experts warning of irreversible escalation once military action begins.

The Trump administration is reportedly repositioning stealth bombers to the U.S. military base at Diego Garcia, a strategic Indian Ocean outpost within striking distance of Iran, signaling potential preparations for military action. This move has sparked warnings from analysts and geopolitical experts, who fear it could trigger a catastrophic escalation involving Russia and China—both of which have mutual defense ties with Tehran.

Stealth Bombers and the Path to War

According to sources cited by Technocracy News, the U.S. is deploying B-2 or B-21 stealth bombers to Diego Garcia, a remote British-controlled atoll that has served as a critical staging ground for American operations in the Middle East since the Cold War. The base’s location allows for rapid strikes against Iranian nuclear facilities, military installations, or oil infrastructure without requiring overflight permissions from neighboring nations.

Retired Colonel Douglas Macgregor, a prominent military strategist, has warned that such a move risks provoking a direct confrontation with Russia and China. “Iran is not isolated,” Macgregor stated in recent interviews. “Any attack on Iran could activate mutual defense agreements, pulling Moscow and Beijing into the conflict.”

Zionist Conspiracy or Geopolitical Gamble?

The potential strikes have drawn fierce criticism from independent media figures, including Mike Adams, founder of Brighteon Broadcast News, who condemned the plan as “Zionist-driven warmongering.” Adams accused former President Trump of betraying his 2024 campaign promises of de-escalation, alleging that his administration is now acting on behalf of Israeli interests.

“Netanyahu has long sought U.S. military action against Iran,” Adams asserted. “If Trump greenlights these strikes, he’s inviting a thermonuclear response from Russia—a nation that has already signaled it will not tolerate an attack on its Middle Eastern ally.”

Russia and China’s Red Lines

Reports indicate that Russia is finalizing a formal mutual defense pact with Iran, expected to be ratified by mid-April. Analysts suggest that Moscow could interpret U.S. strikes as an act of war, potentially retaliating with submarine-launched missiles, cyberattacks, or even strategic nuclear threats.

China, meanwhile, has deepened economic and military ties with Iran through its Belt and Road Initiative. While Beijing is unlikely to engage in direct combat, it could impose crippling financial sanctions, cut off critical supply chains, or support asymmetric warfare via proxy groups.

The Specter of Nuclear War

The most alarming scenario, according to security experts, is the possibility of Iran—or its allies—responding with unconventional weapons. Adams warned that Tehran could activate Hezbollah sleeper cells, target U.S. bases with ballistic missiles, or even provoke a regional nuclear exchange if backed into a corner.

“Once the first bomb drops, there’s no off-ramp,” said former UN weapons inspector Scott Ritter. “This isn’t about neutralizing a threat—it’s about fulfilling a geopolitical vendetta that could end in mutual annihilation.”

A Nation on the Brink

As tensions mount, questions linger over the Trump administration’s endgame. Is this a calculated show of force, or the prelude to another forever war? With global markets already jittery over escalating conflicts in Ukraine and the South China Sea, a strike on Iran could trigger economic collapse, fuel shortages, and a new wave of global instability.

For now, the world watches—and waits—to see if Washington’s next move will bring peace, or plunge the planet into darkness.

Watch the March 28 episode of “Brighteon Broadcast News” as Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, talks about Trump administration reportedly preparing for military strikes on Iran.

This video is from the Health Ranger Report channel on Brighteon.com.